Although it hurts, I think we have to say that if there is fraud of any kind... it has to be exposed, no matter what the cost. The truth is of more value than anything else ~ John Gerhart (11/27/1907 to 1/9/1981) a United States Air Force four-star general who served as commander of the North American Air Defense Command under Presidents Kennedy and Johnson.
This is a commentary that concerns shitheads and people who are nuts. These aren't pejoritives I ever used to describe anyone, or I didn't use them first, at least... this is a bogus claim made by the blogger Joe Kelly. That I called him "nuts" and he only began talking about me behind my back to other bloggers about me being "nuts" in response to me slandering him with the insult first. This is an untruth that Mr. Kelly presented in his shithead post, and is an allegation I absolutely must refute.
Near the end of a commentary on his blog in which he labels me a shithead, he makes the following claim...
Joe Kelly: But since all this "nuts" thing, which WD actually started long before I called him nuts and I submitted his comment on Will's shitheaded blog as proof, I've had no choice but to identify them as shitheads. None of this is my fault. The only responsibility I bear is deciding who is a shithead and who isn't. (8/28/2013 at 1:35pm)
Categorically false. And Joe Kelly (or Hagstrom... a surname he has previously used) knows it; or should know it. Perhaps he does not remember, but I sure as hell do. In any case, Joe's statement is not factually accurate, and I can prove it. The comment he speaks of, the one that he submitted to Will's shitheaded blog as proof, is as follows (Joe published it in the comment thread when I asked him what his "proof" was)...
Joe Kelly: This is the meat of the comment you left calling me a "nut" WD. Further proof you not only started this whole thing, but that you are indeed a shithead. I took no offense. Just WD being WD. But God forbid someone say you're nuts. You big baby. Now quit being a shithead. And you should apologise to me and everyone else for making this conversation, or should I call it now, an intervention as nobody has come to your defense, other than me if you open your shithead eyes. (8/30/2013 at 6:50pm)
What follows is Joe Kelly quoting me...
Joe Kelly quoting Dervish Sanders: What kind of a nut shutters his blog (or restricts readership to "invited" readers only), says he can't blog anymore because it gets him in trouble, then opens up his blog for the world to see again? You think those people you got in trouble with won't check to see if your blog is active again? I asked if you could not simply delete the post that "got you in trouble" and you said no. But that looks like you did delete that post (I don't recall what the title was, but I do recall the subject matter... and it does appear to be gone). (Original source for quoted comment 2/22/2012 at 9:08am)
This is Joe's "proof" that I called him a "nut" first and that I owe him an apology. Trouble is, I remember making that comment, and it was in RESPONSE to him calling me a nut. Actually I heard about this from Will Hart. He told me on his blog that a Liberal Buddy of mine had contacted him via facebook and said I was nuts.
I wrote a post about this conversation on my blog titled, "w-dervish's Liberal Buddies Told Will Hart on Facebook that w-dervish Is A Frigging Nut". In response to this post Joe Kelly said "You're nuts", thereby confirming that he was the person Will described as the "Liberal Buddy" who told him I was nuts. The date that comment was made was 2/18/2012 (Joe's is the first comment the post received). The date of the comment (by me on his blog) that Joe Kelly says is the one that is "proof" I called him a nut first? 2/22/2012.
So, he says the "proof" I called him a nut first is a comment I made on 2/22/2012 which was in reality MY RESPONSE to him calling me a nut on 2/18/2012 (actually this is the date I found out that it was Joe Kelly who called me a nut behind my back in a conversation with Will Hart that took place earlier on facebook). As anyone can see 2/18/2012 is a date that occurred BEFORE 2/22/2012. And 2/15/2012 (the date I found out from Will Hart that Joe was calling me a nut in a conversation that took place on Facebook) is earlier still.
As everyone can see, Joe Kelly's claims about who called who a "nut" first are not accurate. So why the hell does he remember that I called him a nut first? And why does he not apologize after I point out to him that he has the dates wrong? Instead he says "You started it with your nuttery". This is his response to my irrefutable proof that he called me a nut first (and that what he says in his post is utter bullshit)?! Why not admit the mistake? I ask again, who the hell would like being called "nuts" or a "shithead"? I'm guessing nobody. But I object and Joe Kelly says I'm a "big baby"?!
And apparently NOBODY else (as Joe pointed out) sees anything wrong with this? Nobody at all, huh? Even after Joe called me a nut FIRST I still acted in a friendly manner toward him (so this "big baby" charge is bullcrap). But now (with this "shithead" post), not only does he toss red meat to my detractors (Will Hart, Dennis Marks, and Lester Nation), but he sits back and enjoys the show as the raving maniac Steve laughs it up. This is, in my strong opinion, the definition of a shithead. As much as it pains me to say it, Joe Kelly (AKA Joe Hagstrom, AKA Truth 101) is a shithead of the highest order. I wonder... does that mean the Republican conversion is complete?
Sequence of events that PROVE Joe Kelly is a shithead in regards to his claim that I "started" the insulting by calling him "nuts" first
2/15/2013: Date Will Hart told Me Joe was calling me NUTS behind my back on Facebook.
2/18/2012: Date Joe Kelly called me NUTS on my blog in response to a post I wrote about what Will told me.
2/22/2012: Date Dervish Sanders called Joe Kelly NUTS on Joe Kelly's blog (this is the comment he says "proves" I insulted him first).